2027 Forecast

Chaldean numerology

Chaldean numerology assigns letter values by sound rather than alphabetical order, and no letter ever carries a nine. It is often sold as the older system, but the same name usually comes out with a different number than in the Pythagorean table.

Chaldean Numerology: The Full Table and How It Differs

The Chaldean table

Chaldean letter values
ValueLettersPythagorean equivalent
1 A I J Q Y A J S
2 B K R B K T
3 C G L S C L U
4 D M T D M V
5 E H N X E N W
6 U V W F O X
7 O Z G P Y
8 F P H Q Z
9 not used — held sacred I R

Calculate a name in Chaldean

Where it comes from

The system is named after the Chaldeans of ancient Babylon, though the table in circulation today reached the West through nineteenth-century occult writing rather than any surviving Babylonian document. Its actual pedigree is much shorter than the name implies — worth knowing, given how often it is sold as the more ancient and therefore more authentic option.

The missing nine

No Chaldean letter is worth 9. The number was treated as sacred and held apart from ordinary correspondence, so it enters a reading only as a total. When a Chaldean name adds up to 9, that 9 was produced by the sum — never carried in by a single letter.

Why the results differ

Take any name and the two systems will usually disagree, because the tables agree on only ten of the 26 letters — A to E and J to N. In Pythagorean, S is 1 and C is 3; in Chaldean, both are 3. Neither is checkable against reality, so the honest position is that you are choosing a convention, not discovering a fact.

On real names the gap is wide. Among US babies given a top-1,000 first name, only about 9% get the same Expression number from both tables. Two tables with nothing in common would agree by chance on about 9%.

Expression number of US first names in each system, %
Expression number of US first names in each system, %Pythagorean · first names1: 9.88%12: 4.93%23: 11.68%34: 6.27%45: 12.03%56: 5.85%67: 12.86%12.9%78: 11.3%89: 8.3%911: 7.25%1122: 5.06%2233: 4.6%33Chaldean · first names1: 10.95%12: 7.27%23: 9.87%34: 5.01%45: 11.98%56: 8.43%67: 12.59%12.6%78: 10.09%89: 11.84%911: 5.68%1122: 5.31%2233: 0.98%33Source: SSA top-1,000 baby names 2000–2008 · AstroHotastrohot.comExpression number of US first names in each system, %Pythagorean · first names1: 9.88%12: 4.93%3: 11.68%4: 6.27%5: 12.03%6: 5.85%67: 12.86%12.9%8: 11.3%9: 8.3%11: 7.25%22: 5.06%33: 4.6%33Chaldean · first names1: 10.95%12: 7.27%3: 9.87%4: 5.01%5: 11.98%6: 8.43%67: 12.59%12.6%8: 10.09%9: 11.84%11: 5.68%22: 5.31%33: 0.98%33Source: SSA top-1,000 baby names 2000–2008 · AstroHotastrohot.com

Each name is counted by how many babies received it. The two shapes look alike, but they come from different names: the same baby usually lands on a different number in each panel.

See both tables side by side →

Compound numbers

Chaldean practice, as popularized by the palmist Cheiro in his Book of Numbers (1926), reads a total before reducing it. A name that adds up to 38 is read first as the compound number 38 and only then as its root, 11. The single digits describe the outward character; the compound numbers from 10 to 52 were said to show the hidden influences behind it. Pythagorean numerology reduces straight away and has no equivalent layer.

Which name the Chaldean system uses

Here the two systems part company again. Pythagorean numerology traditionally takes the full name on the birth certificate. Chaldean practice takes the name you are actually known by — the one people use when they call you — on the reasoning that its sound is what carries the vibration. A nickname used every day can therefore count for more than a middle name nobody says.

One name, both systems

The name Oliver James letter by letter, calculated by the same code as the name calculator.

Oliver James in both tables
Oliver James in both tablesOLIVERJAMESPythagoreanO = 6 (Pythagorean)6L = 3 (Pythagorean)3I = 9 (Pythagorean)9V = 4 (Pythagorean)4E = 5 (Pythagorean)5R = 9 (Pythagorean)9J = 1 (Pythagorean)1A = 1 (Pythagorean)1M = 4 (Pythagorean)4E = 5 (Pythagorean)5S = 1 (Pythagorean)1ChaldeanO = 7 (Chaldean)7L = 3 (Chaldean)3I = 1 (Chaldean)1V = 6 (Chaldean)6E = 5 (Chaldean)5R = 2 (Chaldean)2J = 1 (Chaldean)1A = 1 (Chaldean)1M = 4 (Chaldean)4E = 5 (Chaldean)5S = 3 (Chaldean)3Method: Pythagorean and Chaldean letter tables · computed by AstroHotastrohot.comOliver James in both tablesOLIVERP.O = 6 (Pythagorean)6L = 3 (Pythagorean)3I = 9 (Pythagorean)9V = 4 (Pythagorean)4E = 5 (Pythagorean)5R = 9 (Pythagorean)9C.O = 7 (Chaldean)7L = 3 (Chaldean)3I = 1 (Chaldean)1V = 6 (Chaldean)6E = 5 (Chaldean)5R = 2 (Chaldean)2JAMESP.J = 1 (Pythagorean)1A = 1 (Pythagorean)1M = 4 (Pythagorean)4E = 5 (Pythagorean)5S = 1 (Pythagorean)1C.J = 1 (Chaldean)1A = 1 (Chaldean)1M = 4 (Chaldean)4E = 5 (Chaldean)5S = 3 (Chaldean)3Method: Pythagorean and Chaldean letter tables· computed by AstroHotastrohot.com

Bright boxes are letters worth the same in both systems. Totals: Pythagorean 48 → 12 → 3; Chaldean 38 → 11.

The same eleven letters give an Expression number of 3 in the Pythagorean system and 11, a master number, in the Chaldean. Only 6 of the letters carry the same value in both.

Cite this page

AstroHot. “Chaldean Numerology: The Full Table and How It Differs.” Accessed November 1, 2026. https://astrohot.com/numerology/chaldean-numerology/

For Wikipedia {{cite web |title=Chaldean Numerology: The Full Table and How It Differs |url=https://astrohot.com/numerology/chaldean-numerology/ |website=AstroHot |access-date=2026-11-01}}